Can I still just go birding?

Time and again in recent weeks I’ve found myself watching old footage on the TV and becoming wistful for what were far simpler times. It isn’t just a case of these times being pre-Covid, although that certainly has a major impact on such feelings.

You could call them thoughts that are indicative of an ageing individual, looking back at times that are comforting through familiarity. But that would be too simplistic.

Can you remember when birding was about, well.... birding?

It has now become politicised.

There is now (at least within the realm of social media) a suggestion that we measure our activity against our carbon footprint. That we have to have an opinion on whether or not we are inclusive enough towards race, gender and sexual preference. That we know exactly where we stand on driven grouse shooting, owning cats, bird photography, twitching, patch birding, noc-migging, etc, etc, etc.

Of course, some of these subjects are important. But... sometimes the want to turn back the clock to a time when going birding, talking about birding and writing about birding was just ABOUT BIRDING. And nothing else. We did have a social conscience back then, but it was not tangled up with our leisure activities. Social media does, of course, play its part in the combining of these subjects. Opinions about ANYTHING - sport, food, travel, lifestyle, you name it - have become entwined with the social issues of the day. You are expected to know where you stand. You are called out on it. You are encouraged, even demanded, to nail your colours to a mast.

Where are the oases from the chatter of politics? Do we have to now accept that everything requires us to question what everything means? That we have our own clear policies and that they are clearly stated?

Or can I still just simply go birding?

Comments

Marcus Lawson said…
Just go birding Steve, they are all hypocrites anyway but believe they are above it all.
4 July 2020 at 22:41
Derek Faulkner said…
I would of thought that in the main, your day to day routines are mostly about ""just birding", with of course other flora and fauna as side attractions. You stay true to your local area and Dungeness and simply get on with birding with, as far as I can recall, few if any, diversions into awkward topics. The only real difference to how it was years ago is that you can now write up what you experience in your regular blogs.
For the whole of my adult life I have stuck to simply birding on just Sheppey, haven't been tempted to twitch or use long lens cameras, or bird watch more than ten miles from home etc., so it can still be done. I have however, found it far too easy to get drawn into some of the debatable subjects that you mentioned.
5 July 2020 at 06:41
Ric said…
Steve, in fishing we have an expression, 'Ignorance is Bliss'. It stems from the way that our early experiences of the pursuit are not cluttered or confused by too much information, much of it negative. It make's life simple.

Much if not all of what we do is in some sort of context. And the way social media and other forms of modern communication works. That context is likely to include everything that is possible, including politics.

We can't go back to the way things used to be. We also can't do everything either. We have the choice but also too many choices as well.

But it is possible to simplify matters. Just a question of which items to dismiss.

Fear of Missing Out. Isn't that the modern dilemma? Easier for those of who are happy with our lot.
5 July 2020 at 08:16
Steve Gale said…
Marcus, Derek and Ric - best solution is to not look at Twitter!
5 July 2020 at 19:36
David Bryant said…
Steve: I share your frustration! It does sometimes seem as if we're expected to sign up (metaphorically!) to one group or another. I photograph wildlife: have done for fifty years. The main difference these days is that the equipment is far better (as are the results) and I don't have to wait two weeks for the out-of-focus results to come back from Boots! And, of course, I can share my images via my blog, Twitter and Facebook. I don't consider myself to be a 'Togger' or 'Twitcher' or any of the far worse things I've occasionally been called by some of the highly-politicised inhabitants of the social media. It did take a while to learn the lesson that it is possible to ignore these negative individuals, while enjoying the feedback from the more traditional birders! Here's mine: I LOVE your blog: you have a fantastic prose style that is redolent of a simpler, more honest age! Keep it up!
9 July 2020 at 07:28
Steve Gale said…
David, I know where you are coming from and it seems as if you have found a way to deal with ‘now’. And thank you for such kind words.
9 July 2020 at 15:57
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Goldfinches and Lavender

Image
We have three medium-sized Lavender bushes in our back garden. Throughout the summer the flowers (which last for several months) are a magnet for insects and give off a most restful aroma. As tempting as it is to cut the dead stems in the autumn, we always leave them, as we know that during the late winter we will get visitors to feed on the seed heads... This video was taken from the kitchen window this morning. We will normally see one or two birds over a few days, but have had up to 14 at once. We never tire of watching them. Lavender is a wonderful plant to have in the garden, with year round natural history benefits. So what are you waiting for? They are readily available at a garden centre close to you right now! There is an historic association with Lavender in this part of northern Surrey and south London. Lavender fields have been harvested for many years, with one particular field close to Woodmansterne being very popular with day trippers. A significant proportion o
Read more

To tell it like it is, or not...

Image
I am grateful to Gavin Haig (Not Quite Scilly) who drew my attention to an opinion piece, penned by Matt Phelps, which appeared in the November issue of 'Birdwatch' magazine, entitled 'Positive Approach', which I have now read. In it, he suggests that there is too much negativity being posted on social media regarding the state of our birding world, which is then acting as a deterrent towards a younger generation in adopting conservation and wildlife study. He also suggests that a lot of this negativity is being generated by older birders, and that these old timers keep banging on about the 'good old days' which isn't helpful in encouraging the youth to pick up a pair of binoculars and get out into the field. Does he have a point? Now, I am undeniably an older birder, and I am also guilty of having posted, blogged, written and spoken about the slump in bird and invertebrate numbers. I also like nothing better than to revisit my notebooks and share in the hi
Read more

Time to reflect

I normally come up with the title for a post after I have written it. If I'm feeling creative it will be some sort of play on words, or if I'm not then an all-encompassing word or two will do. As for this particular post, and with a few things to discuss, I've written the title first, inspired by having just read a feature about musicians who have used the title of an album as the starting point for their creative exercise. Here goes... Firstly, blogs - yes, this very medium that I am writing in and you are reading from. - what content they derive, the reason that the content exists and what the writer should (or should not) expect from any reader that visits the blog. This was brought into sharp focus by a series of posts to be found here, at Jono Lethbridge's excellent 'Wansted Birder'.   His blogging output has recently included detailed and entertaining reports on his recent overseas trips which have received a bit of flak from certain quarters. None of us b
Read more