What makes a birding patch?

If you have been birding for any length of time you would have adopted at least one site as a 'patch'. The chances are that most of us have had several. What makes us choose them?

I have had several patches over the years, and chronologically they appear like this:

Beddington SF, Surrey
1974-1986; 1993-1995; 2010-2012

Dungeness, Kent
1976 - 1991

Holmethorpe SP, Surrey
1991 - 2010

Canons Farm, Banstead
2005 - 2012

The years shown are those that I could reasonably claim to be regularly birding at those places. I would (and have) continued to visit these sites out of these times, albeit on an irregular basis. But even in absence, there is something about these patches that attracts and continues to draw my attention - but what is it that causes this?

There are better places to bird than Holmethorpe and Canons Farm - Beddington, Staines and Barnes Wetland Centre are but a short journey away - so it isn't necessarily the quality of the birds alone. Nor, apart from Canons Farm, are any of my patches picturesque, what with motorway, railway line, landfill and a nuclear power station just some of the attractions to be found on them. Is it the people? To a point, a good bunch of mates having a crack whilst birding will help lift even the most dire of birding days, but in my experience for every 'good bloke' there will be several 'muppets'.

Your birding history will play a part in determining a patch. If you visited Staines Reservoir several times in your birding infancy and on each occasion saw a good bird, the feel-good factor about visiting there would make each trip an exciting event. You would be much more likely to carry on going on a regular basis, even after the good birds failed to appear each time, because you'd know it was a possibility. And what with regaling the other regulars about your 'early successes', your well on the way to becoming a patch legend!

And then there's the difficulty in ever giving a patch up. After investing so much time and effort (not to mention amassing a big list), you are not easily going to throw it all away and start up somewhere new. This is where having several patches can help. If one becomes a bit tiresome you can always move on to another for a while as you recharge your batteries. The downside is you will miss out on some good birds and good times 'with the boys' if you do so. You will never be the patch King...

So, what is it that makes you stick to a patch? I don't know. I've thought long and hard about it. To me, a patch is a place that I revisit because I enjoy birding there and feel comfortable doing so. You can't ask for much more from a site than that... apart from a few good birds.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Kwowww"

On Tuesday evening, at 20.05hrs, I was taking out the rubbish, when I heard a call from south-west of the house. I froze, knowing what it was at once, but scarcely believing it. I had listened to this call on Xeno-Canto many times, getting ready for such a moment but not really considering it something that I would hear over the back garden. After 15 seconds the call came again from the blackness, now directly over head. Yes, there was no mistaking it! Another 20 seconds it called a third time - now further away to the north-east... "Kwowww" A lazy drawl, part bark, part yelp. A Bittern. Nocturnal flight-call. I went back inside and played the call on Xeno Canto just to make sure that I had remembered everything correctly. I had. Bloody hell, a Bittern over suburban Banstead! And only a week after an Arctic Skua had blessed me just a mile or so away. Sometimes the birding Gods do smile on you. To some birders these two species are just small fry, mere starters to the main cou
Read more

Mike Netherwood

Image
I first met Mike Netherwood at Beddington Sewage Farm in early 1975, me being an ultra-keen and ultra-green 16-year old birder, he some 20 years my senior. Mike, together with Ken Parsley, were the remnants of a once much larger ringing group which carried out the trapping and ringing of birds across the open expanse of the sewage farm. Whenever I bumped into them, which I often did, they would both tolerate my many questions about what they had seen and trapped and listen to me waxing lyrical about my own observations. Over the coming months they showed me how they caught the birds, allowed me to witness the ringing and measuring of them and, if I were very lucky, allow me to help them out by holding mist-net poles, carrying bird bags or writing down (scribing) the data that they were collecting into notebooks. By the summer of 1976 I had joined them, proudly in possession of my trainee ringer's permit. For the next three years (until I 'defected' to Dungeness) I spent man
Read more

To tell it like it is, or not...

Image
I am grateful to Gavin Haig (Not Quite Scilly) who drew my attention to an opinion piece, penned by Matt Phelps, which appeared in the November issue of 'Birdwatch' magazine, entitled 'Positive Approach', which I have now read. In it, he suggests that there is too much negativity being posted on social media regarding the state of our birding world, which is then acting as a deterrent towards a younger generation in adopting conservation and wildlife study. He also suggests that a lot of this negativity is being generated by older birders, and that these old timers keep banging on about the 'good old days' which isn't helpful in encouraging the youth to pick up a pair of binoculars and get out into the field. Does he have a point? Now, I am undeniably an older birder, and I am also guilty of having posted, blogged, written and spoken about the slump in bird and invertebrate numbers. I also like nothing better than to revisit my notebooks and share in the hi
Read more